Source: COP21
|
Bad News:
Scott mentioned that the emissions being cut would not be enough to stay below 2oC. Nations are trying to go green while still growing their economy. Additionally, she pointed out that nations, such as the US, are slow to act because they desire national consensus. However, this may backfire because the challenge will be even larger in the future.Good News:
Scott was "slightly more than cautiously optimistic" that COP21 will turn out better than the Copenhagen "failure". Scott pointed out significant changes in the political landscape over the past 6 years including:- Cheaper green technology, such as solar panels.
- Investment groups and banks who see potential in renewable energy.
- Companies from all sectors, including oil, who know that climate change will prevent business as normal.
- Health experts worried about how warmer temperature will affect disease.
- Militaries who can no longer balance being combat ready and first responders for extreme weather.
- Support from people such as Pope Francis, movie stars, and You! Public opinion helps drive what politicians are willing to offer.
It seems, the talk was interesting !!! But some good news you explained, say health worker worry are quite controversial, and i feel they are good, only if a reader is highly optimistic. Anyway, Thanks for sharing the talks take-away lesson.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment Bishal! I didn't realize that there was controversy in the medical community over the effects of climate change on health. I'd love to learn more.
ReplyDeleteNice summary, Darcy. I finally wrote up my notes from this meeting too and ended up adding some extra notes http://climactually.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/notes-on-cop21.html. It was a great talk by Jesse Scott I thought - lot's of content to think about!
ReplyDeleteJesse Scott gave such an imformative talk. I'm glad you thought it was a good summary. I'm excited to read your notes!
Delete